Hmmm to reply with, "exactly" means you concur 100% with Advocator's posts. He "hit the nail on the head"? In his post he claimed,
"If women will never take women to task about IRR, then your entire argument has just fall on death ears."
My entire argument in this thread was that black women (most) will NOT take black women to task. Had I stated black women will take other black women to task, and this turned out not to be the case, yet I was steady claiming it to be, THEN my entire argument would've fallen on deaf ears.
"You have to look no further than the pathetic attempts to somehow analogize the utter hatred directed towards black men in IRR with that directed at black women to see that. The argument was made above that indirect hatred was made towards black women in IRR and that this was some equal to the blatant and outright hatred directed at black men (laughable in its own right). Now this argument is even more inherently flawed because Black men in IRR are subjected to the same indirect comments ("semantics") at the same rate AS WELL AS many, many more comments of out and out hatred...Yet we are supposed to buy into some GW Bush type "fuzzy math" and believe that it is all equal....Man ***!ggas please LMAO."
In your haste to cosign with your leader, you misinterpreted and subsequently misrepresented what I've said. *sighs*. My "semantics" reference was in stating A person saying another is going outside their race=A person saying someone is going outside of their race. Sellout=going outside their race. "I see she's switching out"=going outside their. Two different ways to say...(again for the slow
folks)ONE....IS....GOING......OUTSIDE.....ONE'S.......RACE. I thought I made that expressively clear, especially in listing my examples when I used that word. Here were my examples:
"Kobe is a sellout.<-----that means he went to "other".
Now look at this statement:
"I see she's "switchin out" too...Good luck with that!".<------------that means she went to "other". Don't let the "Good luck with that fool you...it's sarcasm and doesn't actually mean they wish the person luck."
Mind you, my whole point in bringing up "semantics" was because you thought there were a lack of comments referring to her selling out. You claimed the ones you saw were about her hairstyle.
Later I referenced the CONTEMPT and "fiyyah" we see in black male/white female threads as what you guys wanted to see in the black female/white male threads.
Again here were my statements:
"They want to hear:
"She's a SELLOUT."
"She's a DISGRACE to her race."
"She's DOESN'T love HERSELF."
"She DOESN'T love her black father."
"She HATES ALL BLACK MALES!"
"She's a loser who should DIE."
"She can't handle a STRONG BLACK MAN."
They want to see the same CONTEMPT. That fiyyah that makes you back away from your monitor coz you think it's smokin'. That emasculation (only female-wise)
In ***: THEY WANT FEMALES TO GO TO TOWN ON EVE! It's only fair."
So estoric one, can you please tell me how I prepared you that "fuzzy math"; audaciously stating that the two(the TONE of the black male bashing and black female bashing with regards to IR threads) were the same? It's clear as day I was saying they weren't and that you guys wanted it to be so it'd be "fair".
You see, you cosigned with your buddy and said It's clear women are incapable of taking black women to task. I take that to mean some of us (I'm thinking you were referring to Realwoman and myself) will not admit that these things happen but the three things(your WHOLE case against me) that you guys took me to task about, I admitted to.
"If black women don't take others to task....falls on deaf ears." <----------------I admitted they won't.
"You're only supportive of black men when they are with black women"<---------------I listed 3 guys I liked who've stated they date/dated non black women.
"There's a lack of contempt/venom in black female/white male" threads.<-----------admitted to that.
My final question that I pose to you is...how many more fibs will you guys tell with regards to Conscious1?